What Sherlock Holmes We Have!!!!

I found the ‘profiling report’ given by the Crime Analyst, funny. Does not add anything to what the commonner, who has read the facts (that has been revealed), would have concluded.

The person, who sexually assaulted and killed the girl found in a sports bag, enjoys inflicting pain on others.

Crime analyst Kamal Affandi Hashim said the perpetrator derived satisfaction from seeing his victim’s being helpless.

“The use of force may be to compensate his inadequacy or a sense of wanting to be superior. He shows that he wants to be in control by abusing the victim before killing her.

“The insertion of an object into the victim’s private parts was meant to produce delayed sexual satisfaction for him,” he said.

“It’s a ritual of a serial offender in progress. I believe that he has done the same before based on the sophistication of the crime.” 

Kamal Affandi said the person also dumped the bag with the girl’s body in a place where it could be easily discovered to show he was in control of things.

“He’s telling the world that he’s smart. He wants to be in control,” he said, adding that the perpetrator could have disposed the body in a place where it could never be found.

Kamal Affandi said he did not believe the killer was abused physically or sexually as a child.

“The killer is anger-driven and may not need anything to trigger his violent action.

“But I wouldn’t say that he is mentally disturbed or insane,” he added.

Read it the report given here.

1) Of course he is a sadist, hence the use of objects to abuse.

2) The need to be in control, could have been concluded by the fact that the victim is a helpless child!

3) “at the bottom of the staircase of a shoplot in PJS1/48″… cannot be construed as the killer making a statement of being ‘smart/in control’. In fact, the shoplot drop off is to ensure that the body IS found. This is not a DARE, since it is likely that the “woman in jeans and a red top walking about in the area at that time and the bag could be seen then. The woman, estimated to be in her 20s, later entered a Silver Kenari” is clearly troubled (by the ‘walking about’ term meaning ‘seen going back and forth’). My suggestion would be the person was clearly mobile, and the place COULD have been assumed to be randomly selected as a drop off, but definitely is a place that is close to the killer’s or his accomplice’s general movement. In fact, that is what I would emphasis more since the accomplice (definitely a man as the killer, and the girl is the lover). [If we were to believe the claim that the child is illegal (highly probable) edit: as of today at 1.30pm, apparently the DNA tests have confirmed that the child is Nurin. This definitely puts things into a new perspective] few things present itself; The killers were most likely Malaysians (middle to upper class since “brand new sports bag” is a NEW one and a Kelisa to boot). They could have chosen a random child (detachment in an abusive situation, where the abuser does not gain any satisfaction from any attachment to the victim, in contrast to incest rape – an extreme example – and is more commonly the case for a person who has a form of belief system (principles)). Or one could have been foreigners. Both of them could be foreigners would be unlikely (I don’t think so, based on the Kenari and income assertion I made earlier, no offence to foreigners). Moreover, I have a high suspicion of the race of the killers, and how this might further shed light on the case. But I’ll leave it out now, for fear of someone accusing me of arousing racial slurs, etc. Somehow, I think this is what can be safely concluded at the moment.

4) This statement had me chuckling. “Kamal Affandi said he did not believe the killer was abused physically or sexually as a child.” Sigh… if only this can be determined so simply based on Jung’s frameworks. 

5)  “The insertion of an object into the victim’s private parts was meant to produce delayed sexual satisfaction for him,” he said. I agree with this to some extent. Delayed is better translated as ‘prolonged’ pleasure. This is obviously in contrast to him performing the abuse himself (rape). Part of it is to not leave any evidence on the girl. Showing some level of knowledge of this general police investigation, that is gotten from things like watching TV shows (CSI)? Which would again support my theory that the person is not a kampung person or a foreigner.

6) Strands of hair found in the bag is interesting. It could be the lady’s or the man’s. This is good if we can find out what hair type, curly or straight… etc.

If it was me, I would try to find out:

1) THE SPORTS BAG! This is the best evidence we have. What type is it? Where would it be sold and I am sure it would be bought on the day itself (Sunday) or earliest the day before. Details of the bag can really help the investigation.

2) We have the address of the drop off, now it remains to get the details of how long was the woman there before going in. What other thing that the investigators could have left off (like reflection of the person/car), etc.

3) A cursory check on main illegal settlements and ask for any child missing (while promising some form of amnesty for the actual parents, if they are here).

Details and cooperation of the public who may be smarter than the investigators to help out! Seriously… 😛

Going to follow this case closely.

Malaysiakini’s so far covered this in http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/72591 (I’m putting it here for traffic purposes :P)


2 thoughts on “What Sherlock Holmes We Have!!!!

  1. Thank you for your comment. There are certain things you should also consider before making a conclusion.
    a) The fact that the interview was longer and in details than what you read.
    b) The fact that certain elements are intentionally left out by me.
    c) The fact that investigation technique includes the usage of persuasive media campaign targeted towards the criminal themselves.

    I could easily say that the criminal is not acting alone based on the fact that the usage of vehicle to conclude the crime. It could have been a car, small mpv, minivan as the lane is small. The vehicle also can be masked as taxi, utility van etc.
    Two or more person are required to man-handled the victim; 1 to drive and the other to hold the victim in custody at the back seat.

    The criminal is about average built and had stayed or has access to friend staying in the area to explain the presence at the crime scene.

    Based on the evidence left behind, it is not a shobby job;that it had been planned beforehand and when the situation present itself, it had been executed with attention to fine details including not leaving a trail. Common job trait is technician, watch repairment, craftmanship,computer programmer etc.

    The location of the crime itself requires someone with intimate knowledge of the entry-exit. Exit 1 is 30 meters from the house and adjacent to a restaurant which closes at 4am.
    Exit 2 is about 100 meters and being surrounded by 6 units of stall operating 24 hours.
    During captivity, victim need to be guarded 24 hours. Hence, it could not be a single person. Holding cell possibly a vacant building, new area or an area where sound level is high to masked or muffled the screaming victim.

    The dumping ground is picked by the assailants as it may be in their line of sight, by the way.

    I could provide you and the other readers of the article with minute and graphic details but chose not to. By now, with this simple explanation and rambling ,you should know why.

    Thank you anyway.

  2. Kamal: I was just being emo over the whole Nurin thing when it happened. Point b) was considered by myself (seriously) but due to the need to respond and whack at something it was ignored. Point c) was something new for me.
    Yes, my conclusions were hit and miss (which is why I’m basically just following the news at the moment and putting my hands over my mouth on this).

    Anyway, thanks for the lenghty and gracious reply. Really appreciate the effort and the details provided. I’m sure you guys will catch the culprits soon enough.

    All the best in the case.

    God bless.

    Er Lern

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s